« September 2007 | Main | November 2007 »

October 30, 2007

Arts & Minds - an event for everyone

Don't forget the Arts & Minds event this Thursday and Friday

--open to the public, but you must register.

I hope to see some of you there.

Posted by thyliasm at 05:12 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Linking to The Incarcerated Community

There is now a way to connect with the incarcerated utilizing the power of the internet to set up connections between those with internet access and the incarcerated seeking pen pals: Write a Prisoner.com.

(image from Write a Prisoner.com)

What do you think about this?
And will you write a prisoner?
What would be (is) your criteria for deciding which prisoner to contact?

Posted by thyliasm at 04:19 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Integrative Op-shun

By now, there's been so much useful academic specialization that it sometimes becomes difficult to link what has become disparate parts into a whole learner, someone who is able to meld separate learning exposures into amalgamated structures that draw from multiple information and experience strands to form systems of understanding and engagement that could not exist without the mergers.

The compartmental approach or academic fragmentation model properly focuses on an area or sub-area for some level of competence or mastery of that area.

This expertise, however, does not account for the whole of that person who has become an expert.


Interests in interdisciplinary academic models seem to acknowledge a need to assemble wholes from the specialized fragments, but this vision, as well-meant as it often is, sometimes creates a hybrid compartment or fragment; the kinds of outcomes possible from the mergers in interdisciplinary studies have already been and can be imagined, so innovation occurs within conceived constraints; thus, interdisciplinary studies tends to combine that which is easily seen as capable of being combined. Discovery in such circumstances may actually be more compromised than encouraged.

Particular models of the whole that might emerge as interdisciplinary outcomes are assumed if not outrightly stated.


Responsibilities for the construction of the whole learner often is not given to the student who takes part in a structured interdisciplinary program. Often, the whole learner takes responsibility through a form of independent major or modified program for which permission is sought, and often granted.

Ultimately, the student should be allowed to take responsibility for creatively investigating mutiple possible outcomes of assembling knowledge and experience and dream fragments into new structures and systems. Whether or not there is a precedent for outcomes from the particular sets of fragments from which a student can build, the creative building should occur, and with it can occur possibilities of discovery and innovation.

Concurrently, teams of students should be charged with building several somethings from the combined input of their multiple fragment streams.

No knowledge in any given area should be seen as a whole; all is fragment; there may be whole fragmants, but each whole fragment is nevertheless a part of something which is likely a whole fragment itself.

Students leave an academic instution with a degree and multiple integrative outcomes, some of which may have lasting impact on local and global communities.

Why is such an approach so difficult to realize?
What is theatened by such an approach?
How does the institution encounrage and discourage academic community/ communities?

The Global Academy is a network of instititions committed to the whole learner.

An interst in shaping colleagues not competitors may be explored here.

Service learning integrated into classroom experience here

Problem Centered Training here, as offered on the NSF pages here

A model of Integrative Studies to educate responsible citizens here

For concerted efforts to advance integrative learning, click here and here

Posted by thyliasm at 03:21 PM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

October 23, 2007

Transformation

Go here

and then here

and here

Posted by thyliasm at 06:13 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

October 09, 2007

Secret Editors — Do You Trust Wikipedia?

Do you trust Wikipedia? How did this trust or lack of trust develop?
What might be useful criteria for determining appropriate levels of trust?
Who edits Wikipedia?
...and so forth....

Read all about secret editors of Wikipedia.

Do you trust this article?

Posted by thyliasm at 09:06 AM | Comments (5) | TrackBack

FIRST WORLD MAP of HAPPINESS: GET ON THE MAP!

Check out first world Map of Happiness. Here's another article about the mapping of the quality of life, and here's a link to the questionnaire itself, in case you're interested.

How Happy is the World Today - Click here to find out.

Take the unhappy planet index survey

From Men's Health where there's tons of useful stuff comes this article and survey (the last page) about global happiness.

You might want to compare these surveys and their results with this data from the Material World research. This data is part of Nova's WORLD in the BALANCE ongoing investigation.

By the way, I took the unhappy planet index survey, and these were my results:

Happy Planet Index
Your personal Happy Planet Index (HPI) is 61.5, which is similar to that of countries such as El Salvador, Guatemala or Saudi Arabia. This is above the world average of 46, but well below the target value of 83, so you can still do more to improve your health and well-being, or reduce your environmental impact. Your score is above that of your country, 28.8.

Below is a breakdown of the various components that make up your HPI score.

You:
61.5
Average:
43.3
[Average is of all online responses to this survey - not the average for your country]


Life Expectancy
Hurray! Your life expectancy is well above average for your gender and country. Probably, you're doing all the major things right - eating well, not smoking, getting regular exercise, and you're lucky enough to have the right genes. Are there any more ways you could make a difference? Some factors that improve your life expectancy are more surprising than others. For example, giving up your car, avoiding living alone, moving out of the city and shrugging off stress.

You:
99
Average:
80.6
[Average is of all online responses to this survey - not the average for your country]


Ecological Footprint
Your ecological footprint is 5.65 global hectares, or 3.14 planets. This is equivalent to the average in Brunei Darussalam.

Your ecological footprint is below average for the country you live in.

Oh dear! You are using between three and five times your share of the planet's resources, even assuming no resources are set aside for other species. That's well above the world average, and even above the average for most industrialised countries. Perhaps it's time to start taking action. Here are some of the most effective steps that everyone can make to reduce their footprint:

Leave your car in the garage. Car use has a huge impact on ecological footprint. Obviously it's more difficult for people in certain circumstances, but where possible, try to use public transport more. Or, even better, get on a bike!
It's obvious, but we have to say it. Conserve energy. Turn off the lights when you leave a room, buy energy-efficient bulbs and appliances, turn off your TV completely, rather than leave it on standby.
Reduce your waste. If there are ways to recycle where you live, try and do so. If you have a garden, start a compost heap. Re-use plastic bags. Give away clothes you don't use, rather than throwing them away. There are hundreds of little things you can do.
You don't have to become vegetarian, but cutting down on meat, particularly beef, and particularly from animals fed by imported soya feed, is an effective step to reducing your footprint.
It has to be said that air travel is one of the biggest contributors to many people's footprints. For example, flying direct from London to Sydney and back would add 5.44 g ha to your footprint - that's the average Briton's footprint for an entire year. Flights with a connection add even more polluting air miles.
You:
5.65
Average:
5.37
[Average is of all online responses to this survey - not the average for your country]


Carbon Footprint
Your carbon footprint is 3.68 global hectares, or 2.04 planets. This is below the average for your country (5.84 gHa).

You:
3.68
Average:
3.12
[Average is of all online responses to this survey - not the average for your country]


Life Satisfaction
Brilliant! You reported a life satisfaction of 9, which is above the national averages for all the countries of the world. At the individual level, in the World Values Survey, only a quarter of respondents worldwide, and 29% of British respondents reported a life satisfaction of 9 or higher.

You:
9
Average:
6.76
[Average is of all online responses to this survey - not the average for your country]


Well-being
The new economics foundation (nef) recognises that there's more to life than feeling good, which is why our model for well-being is based on four domains – personal feelings, personal functionings, social feelings and social functionings. 'Feelings' refers to your attitude to the way you, your future and society are. 'Functionings' looks at whether you have the opportunities to do the things that bring you well-being. Like with life satisfaction, a score of 5 is theoretically the middle score, but, given the way most people respond to surveys, is below average.

Personal Feelings
In this online questionnaire, personal feelings are assessed with two questions – one testing your optimism and one testing your self-esteem.

You are very secure about yourself and about your future.

You:
8.06
Average:
6.05
[Average is of all online responses to this survey - not the average for your country]

Personal Functionings
In this online questionnaire personal functionings are assessed with five questions – two evaluating your subjective opinion on your health and how activity you are, the other three testing you for feelings of autonomy, purpose and worth.

You are healthy, active and full of strong feelings of worth, autonomy and purpose.

You:
7.73
Average:
6.16
[Average is of all online responses to this survey - not the average for your country]

Social Feelings
In this online questionnaire social feelings are assessed with four questions – three assessing your opinion of your community, whilst the last looks at personal relationships.

You have a very strong sense of trust and belonging in your community, combined with an excellent personal life.

You:
6.74
Average:
5.69
[Average is of all online responses to this survey - not the average for your country]

Social Functionings
In this online questionnaire social functionings are assessed with four questions – two assessing your job / studies, one your free time, and one your community participation. If you did not respond to the work / study questions, your score is judged purely on the other two aspects.

You are very satisfied with your job / course - it is very interesting, rarely stressful, and leaves you plenty of time to do the things you want to do, such as participating in community activities.

You:
7.75
Average:
5.6
[Average is of all online responses to this survey - not the average for your country]

_____________________________

[I'll be using some of this data in various poams]

Posted by thyliasm at 04:42 AM | Comments (3) | TrackBack

October 08, 2007

SPEAKING OF toy STOVES and OVENS, you know

Thanksgiving dinner using two easy-bake ovens:

Jiffy-pop and Kenner Easy-bake Oven and Bubblematic commercial from the sixties:

From the eighties comes the Betty Croker Mini-wave oven commercial (Betty Crocker herself and her various updates [ditto for Aunt Jemima] is quite the poam to study):

And from the two thousands, a recall of the oven:

____________________________________________________________________________________________________

Please note the progress that has and hasn't been made.

Posted by thyliasm at 05:03 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

October 02, 2007

EMPOWERMENT OF SELF

within the parameters of the tools of empowerment, as set by those who make the tools within parameters, some of thich are also protocols of expectation: codes of behavior themselves shapoed by desired outcomes which are likely shaped by some n number of variables

(feel free to play John Conways Game of Life again right now).

So how about taking advantage of some this proliferation of power possibilities yourself?
To start, why don't you SCRATCH
and then, proceed to
SketchUp

Make it, and publish it please, right in your blog, as a comment in this blog, on the Scratch site, etc., etc.

Then play the Darfur Is Dying game.

Then play STOP DISASTERS!.

Then play FOOD FORCE

just before you swing by Vrindavan (a virtual introduction to this sacred location, a region that is the borthplace of Kriskna

—Ah: Vrindavan where, because FAZAL SHEIKH has a (so far) less common understanding of community and his responsibilities to communities, the entire —in high resolution!—
text of Moksha, his book of his images of women exiled in temples of Vrindavan is available to you here.

Did you see Water? A movie about women confronting protocols of expectations in a sacred city?

Plot outline from Amazon.com:

Plot Outline: The film examines the plight of a group of widows forced into poverty at a temple in the holy city of Varanasi. It focuses on a relationship between one of the widows, who wants to escape the social restrictions imposed on widows, and a man who is from the highest caste and a follower of Mahatma Gandhi.

COMMENT ON and RATE THE GAMES please; COMMENT ON and RATE THE GAMES please;COMMENT ON and RATE THE GAMES please;COMMENT ON and RATE THE GAMES please;COMMENT ON and RATE THE GAMES please;COMMENT ON and RATE THE GAMES please;COMMENT ON and RATE THE GAMES please

Long for the thrill of by-gone toys? This video might knock you out with nostalgia:

How I miss the pre-Terminator "worlds's only boxing robots." Surely on the right track, in the right ring, and so forth; perhaps some of the creators of the film and/or some of the film crew played Rockem Sockem Robots. Somehow, the protocols of robot behavior became known (to them); that is to say, the Terminators do not behave outside of what is easy to either imagine or accept about robots.

According to THIS online article, the world's first working robot joined the GM Assembly line in 1961. The fighting robots appeared five years later.

The next time you're at Universal Studios (Orlando, Hollywood and Japan), don't forget to experience T2 3-D: Battle Across Time. Here's the trailer:

________________________________

This talk of terminators and termination is a great seque to politicians in a coming post that I hope you will enjoy.

Posted by thyliasm at 03:12 PM | Comments (5) | TrackBack