June 01, 2006
This is an email I sent to the firstname.lastname@example.org email list a while ago. I'm putting it here as an easy reference.
Medical School Information Systems (MSIS) here at U of Michigan has written it's own version of JavaCosign-1.5. We'd like to figure out how we might join with the official development process, rather than staying out on our own.
As you may have gathered from my recent emails to you and the cosign-discuss group, MSIS has decided to begin using cosign on at least some of our J2EE web apps. Unfortunately, when we looked at the current implementation of JavaCosign we found that the architecture wouldn't work well for our environment. Currently the implementation tightly couples the filter with the connection pool that connects to the Cosignd servers. Each instance of the filter requires it's own pool. There's no way to share the connection pool between different apps that use the filter.
At MSIS we run many web apps per app server, and most of these apps have relatively light traffic. It isn't efficient for each app to have it's own pool.
Given this, Tony Chan (who just recently joined MSIS) and I decided to rework the code to better suit our needs. Frankly, we stepped back, reevaluated the design, and pretty much rewrote it completely. I know it would have been better to work with the cosign team rather than going off on our own, but we just didn't know how to approach the community with plans for a complete rewrite.
So, now we have an alternate version of JavaCosign-1.5. It is functionally equivalent, with one exception, however the configuration file format is different. The one feature we cut out is the dynamic rereading of the config file if it changes. If the community affirms that that feature is necessary, then we'd be willing to look at putting it back in.
This new version is designed around interfaces and modularity. The filter functionality and the connection pooling functionality are completely separate. The pooling implementation is pluggable, as well as the objects that are pooled. We have two pooled objects implemented: the ConnectionList as in the current JavaCosign, and a SingleConnection object that just keeps open one connection at a time. We have not used JAAS, we have removed all singletons and substituted stateless service objects. We think the code is much simpler to understand and easier to work with (but, of course, we would).
Although we have developed this new version on our own, we do, actually, want to work with the Cosign community. We just aren't sure how to do that. So, how do you suggest we proceed from here?
Posted by jaynes at June 1, 2006 08:29 AM
Hi Will, I'd be curious to see how things have come along since your deployment of your customm JCosign. My department has been trying to get JCosign working with JBoss/Tomcat, but have been facing a lot of issues and thus far can't get it to work.
Could you contact me via email (suhopdu at umich) to discuss further, if convenient?
Hope Dundas, U-M Housing IT Office
Posted by: suhopdu at October 31, 2007 10:18 AMLogin to leave a comment. Create a new account.